We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

David Jackson's Discussions (328)

View

Discussions Replied To (225)	Replies	Latest Activity
"love the Irwin and the history behind it." David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to What's new in your collection?	6019	13 hours ago Reply by Martin Peters
"yeah thats what I meant when I said clean it up, was for keeping it purposes. if i…" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"Glad I could help in some way. The signature stuff I learned from these guys here t…" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"The new pictures definitely show it rougher than it looked in the ball case, and the…" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"in pic number 4 here, I can make this out: Rawlings started stamping the RO-A Cushi…" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"nope, not a 60's ball" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"This is an 80's or early 90's rawlings ball. almost looks like someone intentionaly…" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"I dont think the signature dates to that period. Did you manage to get any pics of t…" David Jackson replied Sep 3, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"looks good. early 90's probly. " David Jackson replied Aug 30, 2012 to Help with Authenticating a Mikey Mantle Autograph Baseball	27	Sep 4, 2012 Reply by Joe Neal
"awesome pickups!" David Jackson replied Aug 28, 2012 to What's new in your collection?	6019	13 hours ago Reply by Martin Peters