We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Here are a variety of signatures from the late '70s/early '80s.  I've studied the Eastwood studies (really), but remain somewhat befuddled.  I do not have high hopes for any of these, but will welcome your opinions.  Eastwood experts, thank you for taking the time to look.

clint1.jpg

clint2.jpg

clint3.jpg

clint4.jpg

clint5.jpg

clint6.jpg

Views: 622

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here are some good recent examples from some friends of mine that graph hollywood and in NYC have gotten recently.

Thank you Tony.... those are some beautiful pics!   The signatures - good  or bad - that I have are from 30+ years ago, so don't much resemble recent autographs... that's why I'm not sure.  I've found examples in the signature study that sort of match, but seems to be a lot of variation over the years and my eye is not keen enough to make a determination.    Would love opinions from an Eastwood expert on this post.

I am not really an expert on eastwood but i do have a nice Josey Wales Movie poster photo signed hanging up on my wall...Love it

Hey steve. Would you be willing to part with any of the john lennons you have?

Thank you for the offer, Heath.  Not just yet.  Should I decide to do so, my new friends on this forum will have first dibs....

Hi Steve

I´m not an expert - fare from it, but your signatures looks genuine to me. This because the following:

To my knowledge, the difference between the secreterials in the ´70s and ´80s and the C.E. signatures are  mainly  to be found around the "C, the "E" and the "d".

The sec. signatures starts the "C" inside the loop and halfway up. The C:E. starts the "C" outside the loop and at the bottom or beneath it. The sec. "C" and "E" tilts at the same angel and the two loops have the same overall area. The C.E. signatures have very different angels on the two loops and they don´t have the same overall area. The "C" is much more upright than the "E", and at the "E" the overall area is much bigger than it can be seen on the "C".

About the "d" the sec. signatures forms a straigt and thin line at the top, but at the C.E. signatures the "d" forms a loop at the top - it often looks like a "cigar". 

I have an C.E. signature from 82 and it looks like yours, and the special way "To" is written are the same as on yours.

It´s probably  old knowledge to you, but if not, I hope, that it can help a little.

 

Hello John, thank you so much for taking the time to share this information.  Very helpful. As these were all from late '70s/early '80s some from dealers and some TTM - none in person - I've been very curious and welcome opinions and feedback.  I've seen examples of more recent signatures, as those Tony was kind enough to post.  Mine of course, look nothing like that.  Could be due to being 30+ years ago...or, maybe they're secretarial.   Good to know that you have a similar signature from the same time period.  If yours is good, that's encouraging.... thanks again, Steve

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service