John lennon mystery piece - Autograph Live2024-03-29T07:57:35Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/john-lennon-mystery-piece?feed=yes&xn_auth=noWhat if the drawing was not o…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-11:3524372:Comment:10473732017-03-11T01:34:28.738ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>What if the drawing was not of John Lennon and all else remained the same? What would we be left with?</p>
<p>What if the drawing was not of John Lennon and all else remained the same? What would we be left with?</p> Hahaha..tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-11:3524372:Comment:10472802017-03-11T00:29:49.304Zvan den Berghttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/vandenBerg
Hahaha..
Hahaha.. "Whew!"tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-11:3524372:Comment:10473712017-03-11T00:27:29.454ZJim Cushmanhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JimCushman
<p>"Whew!"</p>
<p>"Whew!"</p> Ok discussion closedtag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-11:3524372:Comment:10472782017-03-11T00:26:05.255Zvan den Berghttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/vandenBerg
Ok discussion closed
Ok discussion closed No disrespect intended but yo…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-11:3524372:Comment:10472762017-03-11T00:23:40.370Zfab432https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/LenHruszowy
No disrespect intended but you need to move on with this. I make a 5 just like John's and I didn't write the note or draw the picture. I think you might need to try and convince a new group of collectors as this group seems to be pretty steadfast in their opinions that your item was not done by John Lennon.
No disrespect intended but you need to move on with this. I make a 5 just like John's and I didn't write the note or draw the picture. I think you might need to try and convince a new group of collectors as this group seems to be pretty steadfast in their opinions that your item was not done by John Lennon. Japanese form 1976tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-10:3524372:Comment:10470602017-03-10T23:50:04.761Zvan den Berghttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/vandenBerg
Japanese form 1976
Japanese form 1976 Nothing on the back .like i s…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-10:3524372:Comment:10470992017-03-10T23:48:35.071Zvan den Berghttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/vandenBerg
Nothing on the back .like i said before.its looktrough paper.everybodys focussing on the drawing.forget about the drawing.look at the text for a change.each letter.new effidence? Well lets look at the nr 5. Its written in 2 pieces.he did this already when he was young.See his poststampbook.and also in 1976 when he was studying japanese.
Nothing on the back .like i said before.its looktrough paper.everybodys focussing on the drawing.forget about the drawing.look at the text for a change.each letter.new effidence? Well lets look at the nr 5. Its written in 2 pieces.he did this already when he was young.See his poststampbook.and also in 1976 when he was studying japanese. I often ask this question fir…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-10:3524372:Comment:10471842017-03-10T21:02:13.394ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>I often ask this question first but seem to have gotten distracted for some reason. What, if anything, is on the Reverse? Sometimes, there is more useful data there than on the Obverse.</p>
<p>I often ask this question first but seem to have gotten distracted for some reason. What, if anything, is on the Reverse? Sometimes, there is more useful data there than on the Obverse.</p> No offense, but that would be…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-10:3524372:Comment:10471802017-03-10T20:44:40.219ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>No offense, but that would be like watching Titanic 2. However, I am open to new evidence - it's just that there has not been <em>any</em> at all yet, and I am running out of things to look at here. One wonders why Lennon would draw something so small for example. What about the totally atypical borders and placement? The inset nature of the "portrait" - shaded back, with Lennon's known drawings generally having a free-floating flat quality? The unexplained squaring, the toned substrate...if…</p>
<p>No offense, but that would be like watching Titanic 2. However, I am open to new evidence - it's just that there has not been <em>any</em> at all yet, and I am running out of things to look at here. One wonders why Lennon would draw something so small for example. What about the totally atypical borders and placement? The inset nature of the "portrait" - shaded back, with Lennon's known drawings generally having a free-floating flat quality? The unexplained squaring, the toned substrate...if you want to discuss shading, even the stippling seems quite different in employment from known Lennon works. What else is there? </p> To be continued...tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-03-10:3524372:Comment:10472632017-03-10T20:32:43.540Zvan den Berghttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/vandenBerg
To be continued...
To be continued...