We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

To me this looks good but I would like to get other opinions. 

Views: 3896

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

My hunch is yes.

It would be restoration job.

get a quick opinion. personally, I do not like it. the location is suspicious, nicely fit between the damage and the printing.  I am really skeptical on this one.

It looks good to me too.

It does appear at least some of that wear is under the signature which could be consistent with either scenario? Hard to see/say.

Others?

Eric

this is genuine dont waste money on a quick op Roger has already seen it and passed it ,its been on e bay twice lastly through the memorabilia vault it sold for around $900 it came originally with the e mail from Roger as    looks good

it was signed in the summer of 67

Roger has a great job! He would clean up.

It looks a lot like my middle 70's piece but the J is throwing me on this one, maybe a dead pen, but the J seems to be malformed and leaning the wrong way. 

The items roached.
Pete the J is what is bothering me also. I can understand why it hasn't sold previously.

This was signed 1974ish notice how the J leans away from the rest of the signature? 

All his earlier J's have the straight top line. I am not questioning Roger, but between the J here and the condition of the item....this one certainly wouldn't be for me, even if it was a great deal.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service