We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

OPINION AGAIN--take LOOK-BUDDY HOLLY AND CRICKETS! AND DYLAN!!

Let me explain--this has provenance. Bought years ago from the woman at that time in her 60's in MO who said she got this in person by all 3 on an album page after the concert Feb 1958. I had emailed a copy of the graphs to either buddy Holly's brother in law or Cousin (thin the former) who examined it and rendered opinion "I have turned down a whole lot, this looks like it is probably the real deal and I can tell you exactly what date it was signed as Buddy only went thru kansas City One day in 1958:.    That was about 20 years ago.   two years ago I showed it to PSA and they immediately said :NO GOOD....but I had also shown PSA a REAL Crosby Stills nash Young LP signed in front of me (all 4) and they said "NO GOOD" > isaid how can al album I saw signed bye a FAIL. They said it didnt match THEIR examples. i said then YOUR examples are BOGUS because I have gotten CSNY since 1986 and i KNOW their graphs.. SO--i leave it to you--is this GOOD...Buddy's brother in law said "they key to a GOOD Holly graph is he signs his name in 3 separate parts and puts a LOOP in the H". I looked at what i have...and It has the Loop and is signed in 3 parts. The other 2 band members also look good to me.  OPINIONS?

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

There is provenance on the Dylan...it was signed for Peter Plank who served in Government I beleive in kansas or Oklahoma in the 70's.  It was signed around 1975 Opinions? DYLAN is very hard to identidy but a pre 80's example might be easier..this is signed between 74-76. I beleive it to be REAL which would real DYlan I own..if yoour opinions are GOOD. i aheb MET Dylan 4 times and just FINDING him is a real task...he refused all 4 times I met him in the strangest ways. ive NEVER seen him touch a pen...i dont beleive anything on ebay ANY dealer is selling is real. I got this in 1984.

Views: 458

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

buddy holly looks great...and ESPECIALLY w/ the other crickets (like Joe). His signature looks EXACTLY like all the Joe's I've seen. not to mention the writing above it. forgers don't write "signed 1958" near the signature, where you might not want it to show for framing purposes.
WOW--thank you so much...I will hold this opinion and save it. PSA said FAIL..but PSA also FAILED multiple items I saw signed right in front of me.....so so much for pSA. I have to find them letter (I have it here in some folder of my file cabinet) from hiolly's relative. He said he saw MANY holly autographs. I think I have a winner here..and quite valuable.....thank you. DYLAN..it's a 70's example.... he changed in the 80's, 90's and today... I  can authenticate a 90's Dylan and today..not 70';s when this was probably signed....but authenticating Dylan..when you didnt see him sign..(and who DOES see him sign) is tricky.

The "Bob" part looks weird, but the Dylan part looks excellent.

 

I'm no expert, but both look like the real deal to me.

 

On a side note: a realtive of Buddy Holly really doesn't mean a lot. I'm guessing the "experts" have seen more examples of his signature than a relative.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service