We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
PSA Quick Opinion of Michael Jackson LP - Too Cautious?
Was surprised they deemed this "Likely NOT Genuine" Are they getting more conservative with their quick opinions? Thought this "Bad" LP is NOT bad at all.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Prashant Kaushik on
-
Bruce,
I am confident that signature is authentic.
-
Permalink Reply by Sandra Rose on
-
It does like his signature on his Will.
-
Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on
-
Do you know Sandra who are the BEST at authenticating Michael's signature?
-
-
I think Steve authenticates MJ autos.
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
I don't officially authenticate autographs. Bruce, Roger Epperson is tops on MJ and he charges $15 for an online opinion. You can email him at roger@rogerepperson.com.
-
-
You're right. Roger Epperson is who I was thinking of. Sorry about that. :)
-
-
I wouldn't buy it myself. It doesn't have the flair and style even the fastest Michael Jackson autographs have. I think it's a so-so forgery.
-
-
Steve, here's MJ's signature on his official will. You will see that there are similarities in the two autos. But having said that, I wouldn't buy it either Steve. :)
-
-
Sandra,
That looks like it could be a genuine MJ to me, although I'm not completely comfortable with it. It looks like it was signed slower than he usually did, but that could be because it's a several generation photocopy, or because whoever captured the signature "lassoed" it off the document image instead of cropping the entire area.
But look how erratic the slants of the small letters are in the one Bruce posted than this one. Big difference.
-
-
It is very erratic and I truly have never seen Michael sign like the one Bruce posted.
-
Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on
-
I agree with PSA on this one
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
