"Thanks guys! "

"Looks good to me as well."

"Looks fine to me"

"the Williams is good.  the Mays resembles a known forgery style."

"Beautiful signature"

"Thank you! "

"Dang, that's a beautiful one! Thanks for sharing! "

"For comparison, here's one of my Williams balls (PSA/DNA). It's a run of the mill, vanilla signature. Again, nothing at all concerns me with your example. "

"No problem.  I tend to look for these type of inconsistencies, they directly effect the flow of the signature."

"Thanks!  I think I see what you mean. There's like a level change at the point youre talking about. Not necessarily a lift, but the ink drops a bit lower. Didn't see that initially, thanks for the insight! "

"I agree 99.9% the Williams is good, my only issue is that the d in Ted is bigger/higher than the W in Williams.  usually, you see a much smaller/shorter d. As far as the Mays I totally agree, way too many forgeries of squiggles.  The one…"

"Thanks AC!  Can imagine about the Mays. Would love to add to my collection, but am pretty nervous because I know there's so much forged stuff of his squiggles!"

"The Williams is good. I'll refrain from commenting on the Mays ; over the last 10 years the forgeries are often indistinguishable from the good stuff. Even the pros are getting fooled. "

"Happy to help"