We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Hi all,

I'd appreciate your thoughts and opinions on this John Lennon signed drawing.

Thanks for your input,

Larry 

Tags: John lennon, drawing, signed

Views: 786

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Unfortunately to me the signature appears consistent with a known forgery style.

Fake!

Lennon was far more skilled at controlling volume with line for one.

In my opinion, the autograph looks like what's commonly called a Southern California forgery. I don't think the drawing looks anything like Lennon's work either, unfortunately.

California Cameo Proof Morgans, Southern California Forgeries, Florida Bowies..this is like a geography lesson! ;)

Check this out - origin of this forgery?

Show the original please. Where was that from?

Hi Steve, original is shown, full. I "cropped" to match the forgery and darkened the background (I left out a bit at left for copyright). Original on right. A common (idiot forger) "Honeymoon" 1969 litho. The fake is inset (left). "1969" seems all this "genius" got right.

Hi Eric,

So the other one is a forgery too?

The other one is real. It's from the 1969 Bag One litho set.

Aside from the crazy spacing between the two "N"s, and the sloppy sketching: noting the "7" in 75. Most of the dated autos I've seen with strong origins do not have the slash through the "7", except for maybe one or two I've noticed with a slash touching the vertical part, but not centered through the vertical part of the "7" as it is here.

Anyone here ever study John's style of writing numbers?

No Steve, the full image is the 1969 litho by Lennon "Honeymoon" - the forgery is inserted (left). The original is "white". E

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service