Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by MarkG on June 8, 2018 at 7:27am

1. The N is not characteristic (even against examples 30 years ago) - far too high on the 2nd upright.

2. A pause...for thought as to the next move?

3. In /90s2000's Neil's autograph was wider on the "feet" of the N - even when rushed

4. Uncharacteristic L - doesnt look right, it looks to high next to the linking Y. Also i believe if he had time to do such an ornate flourish at the end, he would have split the Neil and the Young up

5. Whoooah - this would be a unique finish.

Someone correct me if  I have got this wrong but I wouldn't touch it  - it would have to be one of the largest signatures he has ever done too...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jarle on June 8, 2018 at 8:29am

Thanks for your detailed answer MarkG.

I was also reacting on the size of the signature. I’m too novice to figure out your other points by myself, but I totally agree.

It’s for sale on a Norwegian website, so luckily it is not mine.

• ▶ Reply