We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Opinions?

Views: 515

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I was not sure. Thanks all !!!

Understandable. I never mean to sound harsh, just concise. 

Terrible forgery!!!

John didn't start signing his signature like that until mid to late 1963. The ink on the signatures doesn't look like it's 58 years old either. The paper they are signed on doesn't look very old either. Personally, I would stay away from this one.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service