We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Views: 703

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Neither tbh, there is is too many Hendrix autographs coming up in auctions and on dealers sites.There as been big flurry over the last ten to fifteen years he was only signing autographs between the back end of 1966 to 1971 which is four and bit years, yet the autographs are never ending...something odd is going on.

I would definitely avoid the ones from 1971. :)

+1 LOL Although I did once see a magazine with the headline of Bowie's 2016 death signed by..."Bowie".

Now that’s pretty bad. Ha ha.

Many people are old in these years and sold for money... Hendrix signed many and many times in the first year 1967... i'm sure,  like Beatles (in 1963) and rolling Stones (in 1964). There are many autographs of Hendrix from 1967 in Uk for me, but many people not sell them...

Many and many autographs of the Beatles in the market are from 1963... Rolling Stones 1964... Hendrix 1967 what is the problem? Less popular and more autographs... more pouplar and less autographs.

No, earlier in their careers, when their popularity hadn't skyrocketed yet, they were more accessible to fans, and happier to be signing.

I wrote what you said. Less popular and more autographs.

Personally, I would opt for the first one.  It's just a very clean signature, and appears to be in very good shape.

Yes Gratefulphish. This is a great clean signature and complete...

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service