Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David K on January 29, 2012 at 3:47pm

its not rea.l..the P is wrong in PAUL.. way too small and not round enough , ths A is wrong in Paul..etc .you cant see it all clearly signed in a partial dark spotto cover the forgery..sorry agree with the others above..its a forgery. who sold that junk?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike P on January 29, 2012 at 5:51pm

thanks for your input terrier.  I thought i looked nice too.  I wasn't sure on the prices of McCartney's that's why I had my doubts.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David K on January 29, 2012 at 3:48pm

A beautioufl forgery..so close but the slanting and the way the p and a interlock..it's fake...nice try.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 29, 2012 at 6:38pm

I wouldn't write it off so quickly.  I have seen many Mc sigs that are rushed, or he is signing at a bad angle.  While I would not personally buy this one, there are many others out there that are authenticated by the best in the business, that I also would not want to own.  It is NOT a good forgery, that is one of the positives.  its a mess, and it looks like he signed it either in a hurry or at an awkward angle, but again, I would not write it off so quickly.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 29, 2012 at 6:39pm

by the way WHICH one are you referring to?  we are talking about the link that Mike provided to  a UK ebay auction, not the one in the photo, which I do not care for.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David K on January 29, 2012 at 7:22pm

I am referring to the one you don';t like..the "A" is wrong and the "U" in Paul.....there is no slant to the a  ,  andnot round enough, the u doesn;t have usual pointy end to the  bottom of the u..I think it's fake..the My opinion..not stating 100% i am SURE it;s fake.,.just my opinion. Again..always a possiblity as you say a rushed signature...but then it;s not a "classic" Macca example..so I personally would pass.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tom Oliver on February 3, 2012 at 2:09am

first mccrtney good fake ut bad as paul 90% signs downwards n the secon d u can not be sure i cn list all my mccartney i have obtained and they are all different paul does not sign good signatures any more, unless very low key meetings or his security has taken the item to give him or at a signing

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• Paul McCartney3.jpg, 78 KB
• Paul MccARTNEY01.jpg, 106 KB
• paul mccartney 007.jpg, 88 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David K on February 3, 2012 at 2:23am

Someone who agrees with me...the A and U are just wrong..slant sizing, style...it's exactly as you state a VERY good forgery..would fool MOST people...not davy collectors.  I went for him after SNL last year and his driver yelled at everyone badly for chasing him.he would not sign..he signs as few as he can get away with these days and not make himself look "bad" to the media. Dont even start on RINGO not signing lol

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 3, 2012 at 4:14am

this discussion is very confusing. the signature I am referring to is not in a photo here, it is a link to an ebay listing.  The signature that is the subject of this discussion, is not even a good forgery. it is horrible.  the rushed signature I am referring to is the one referenced by Mike P on sunday.  the ones in the photos here are not good, in my opinion.  I might be a good idea to reference WHICH signature you are referring to when offering your opinion.  Tom, thanks for sharing the IP Mac sigs, it helps with the education.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David K on February 3, 2012 at 10:29pm

OK Let;s be clear...the Blue card..is Fake...we all agree..the signed EBAY Link..the beatles album ';appears" authentic....that is my opinion. The A is a bit off...but if he signed it quickly the rest seems to be genuine. I think we agree. Blue card-fake..ebay-probably real.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page