Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on February 2, 2013 at 6:41pm

Alex, lol, sorry to report again that these are bad fakes, or at least the Page and 2nd plant are. Where are these coming from?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alex Tomic on February 2, 2013 at 6:43pm

Thanks Carl, how on earth do you determine they are fakes?

No offence but some were hand signed by the artist to me personally LOL

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on February 2, 2013 at 6:51pm

Well the Page is definetly  a fake. No doubt about that. Its not even close. The first plant could potentially be real and so could the second, but the second looks off. The GNR items are horrible fakes. And no offense, but if you got some of these hand signed by the artist then why would you be asking for opinions on them?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on February 2, 2013 at 6:51pm

The Plant signed in ballpoint pen is authentic. The other two are horrible forgeries. That's one of the worst Page forgeries I've seen. Sorry!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alex Tomic on February 2, 2013 at 7:39pm

Hi Devon

First of all thank you for your opinion

Secondly, not trying to discredit your opinion, always with the intention of learning , but what if I told yu the last signature (R. Plant) was authentic. What in your opinion makes it a fake?

Thanks for your time

Alex

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on February 2, 2013 at 8:18pm

Sure, Alex. Happy to explain how I reached my opinion. It has none of the characteristics of an authentic Robert Plant signature. The flow, slant, and style of the signature do not match Robert Plant's authentic signature. It also has many of the characteristics of known forgeries. Hope this helps.

• ▶ Reply