Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Nick on November 22, 2013 at 8:07am

Anything on the Clemens especially would be appreciated.   I know he is quite expensive in person and therefore would be a good target for a forger.   THank you!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Null on November 22, 2013 at 8:31am

I don't study Clemens, but unless that is an older version it does not look like the 2 I have owned. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nick on November 22, 2013 at 9:25am

Thanks for the reply Ryan.   Yeah, I have never seen one where I could actually make out the "Roger".   It is on a Bobby Brown ball, so it could have a bit of age to it, but nothing crazy.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Geoffery Wallace on November 25, 2013 at 9:23pm

Definitely an older version of Clemens' signature that I am not familiar with.  I do like the La Russa based on signatures I have obtained in the past.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nick on November 26, 2013 at 9:30am

Thanks for the response. Actually passed in the clemens and picked up the larussa.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 26, 2013 at 1:49pm

clemens is likely authentic, late 80's version

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Geoffery Wallace on November 26, 2013 at 3:29pm

Just looked around for some older Clemens signatures and after comparing them, I would say likely genuine also.  I have only got Clemens signatures post 1998 and he does not spell out the "Roger" in his signature in the fashion that this autograph was signed.  Good find on the La Russa ball, Nick!

• ▶ Reply