We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

MJ auto opinion needed

Hey guys can you let me know what you think of this auto
Thanks!

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 70 KB

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by mjfan uk on March 1, 2014 at 8:28am

Where did you get them? Please don't say one of those new online auctions that have sprung up!

Permalink Reply by Carlos on March 1, 2014 at 9:55am

Is there something wrong with them?
What specifically?

Permalink Reply by Carlos on March 1, 2014 at 10:11am

Kyle m, if you look at this montage the autos look exactly the same.
Is this a fake style?
Let me know your thoughts
Thanks

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 352 KB

Permalink Reply by mjfan uk on March 1, 2014 at 10:20am

I do think the sigs look good, but where did they come from/what's the provenance? I just said what I did before because I noticed two new online auctions, some of the stuff on them I thought looked dubious. Knaisz and the other was simon parr, I think.

Permalink Reply by Carlos on March 1, 2014 at 10:40am

Oh I was just looking at different styles to familiarize myself with mj's signature. I don't own these. The pic came from gottahaverocknroll.
So the auto style is legit?

Permalink Reply by Ema Dan on March 1, 2014 at 12:55pm

Ok... I have a problem with the shoes, I'm pretty sure those are bad.
The middle pic in the montage, that sig looks good to me and has legit handwriting that matches also.
The last pic, signed on the Bad album... that one has characteristics of a later MJ, but I'm not 100% sure on calling it ok.. there's something "too good" about it, but that doesn't mean it's bad. I just don't know on that one.

Permalink Reply by Carlos on March 1, 2014 at 1:13pm

What about the shoes don't you like?
Thise 3 look the same to me

Permalink Reply by Ema Dan on March 1, 2014 at 1:51pm

Carlos- The shoes resemble a known forgery more than an authentic MJ.
Those 3 sigs are all as different as they can be actually. The only thing they have in common are the extended M--LJ--N, which is not enough to call an MJ sig authentic by a long shot.
MJ is very hard to judge, not only because there's a million forgeries, some of which even come from people close to him, but because he's been signing for 45years and his hand has matured. Also, funny enough, his sigs will all look different, even in the same sitting. All this is not to say that the significant differences between a real and fake can't be seen, they can be.

Permalink Reply by Carlos on March 1, 2014 at 1:52pm

Can you show me other "fakes" like the shoes

Permalink Reply by Ema Dan on March 1, 2014 at 2:02pm

I don't remember where this came from, but it's not just cuz those shoes resemble this pic. It's because they just don't look like an MJ.

Attachments: No photo uploads here