Cal Ripken Jr Opinions Please

I believe both to be Genuine, they have the (it) factor in his C and al. J on the BB seems suspect but still genuine. Opinions please    

Views: 1550

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 5, 2014 at 6:24am

ball is bogus in my opinion.  not sure about photo.

Permalink Reply by al martin on May 5, 2014 at 8:54am

My book

Permalink Reply by Erich Jerozal on May 5, 2014 at 1:48pm

I don't like the photo.  I think the ball may be good.  Its an earlier sig.  Now I`m no expert on Ripken by no means.  Only my opinion. 

Permalink Reply by GraphingMlb on May 5, 2014 at 3:35pm

i think the ball is an earlier sig.

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 5, 2014 at 4:12pm

I still think its junk.  looks slowly written to me.  and I have never seen another one like this. he has been pretty consistent over the years.

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on May 5, 2014 at 4:42pm

Both look bad to me. I wouldn't buy either of them.

Permalink Reply by al martin on May 5, 2014 at 5:39pm

Agree, I would pass.

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on May 5, 2014 at 6:08pm

I dont like either.

Permalink Reply by Anthony Bautista on May 5, 2014 at 6:22pm

The photo doesn't look good , but the baseball has some chance. Here is a similar authentic one . don't know.

Permalink Reply by Anthony Bautista on May 5, 2014 at 6:23pm

You would probably have to find some known 1993 examplars to use to authenticate it 100% .

Permalink Reply by al martin on May 5, 2014 at 6:47pm
Permalink Reply by John Laubach on May 5, 2014 at 6:53pm

He has changed his signature at least four times in his career. The stuff you have looks like his earlier signatures.

RSS

As an eBay Partner Network Affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Get Our Newsletter

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2026   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service