We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Beatles set from 64 - opinions?

This set looks good to me - all agree? Provenance is very good, if not cast iron.

Views: 647

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on November 21, 2014 at 11:44pm
Authentic and a nice set!
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 22, 2014 at 5:20am

authentic, but slant in Ringo is not typical.  but definitely authentic

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 22, 2014 at 10:57am

This looks good to me too.

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on November 22, 2014 at 11:00am
Authentic
Permalink Reply by spaceman on November 22, 2014 at 11:29am

A good set.

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on November 22, 2014 at 11:50am

Thanks everyone. I thought it was a very attractive set too but having learnt a costly lesson on at least one set of Beatles autographs (probably two) I'd rather be safe than sorry. The autographs are on the back of the attached photograph. The photo looks familiar to me but I cannot quite place it - any ideas on place and date?

Attachments: No photo uploads here
Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on November 22, 2014 at 12:49pm
I think they mostly look good, but as stated above, the Ringo looks really off...very sharp and angular...the "into" isn't like anything I've seen on authentic sets.
Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on November 22, 2014 at 5:48pm

Yup...looks OK to me too..

Permalink Reply by JJ on November 22, 2014 at 7:24pm

If the photo looks familiar to you it may be due to the fact that it's very similar to card #21 in the first b/w trading card set from 1964. 

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on November 23, 2014 at 12:11am

Thanks jj.

I think there is some doubt about the Ringo. Someone has suggested that it might be an Aspinall.

Would it help if I said that the autographs were obtained at the Ipswich Gaumont on 31 October 1964? Someone may even know when Neil was with the band on the 64 tour.

The photo may not have been signed in front of the recipient so it may be that Neil signed for a missing Ringo - particularly as he was the last to sign.

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on November 23, 2014 at 5:46am

This photo of the band was given away with the programmes for the fall 63 u.k tour (silver & gold foil covers, tour ran from 1st Nov-13th Dec), all four autographs are authentic and to me they look to be signed at the end of 1963.

Permalink Reply by spaceman on November 23, 2014 at 10:04am

I totally agree with  Beatleworld.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Groups

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service