We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

1

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rich on June 12, 2015 at 7:36am

I can't say much about the autograph itself, and I think that the forgery issues were limited to Jackson and possibly McCartney (I can't remember the exact circumstances), but he was one of the prime offenders in this mess. That being said, your concern is just. That doesn't mean your autograph is fake, but personally if I'm purchasing a scribble that can't be authenticated conclusively on the signature alone, I'd try to get it from the best source I can. Given Manning's recent history, I wouldn't include him in this category.

Permalink Reply by Rich on June 12, 2015 at 8:17am

I got lost in that whole mess. There are several threads on it, though they get a bit tougher to follow. It'd be great of someone closer to the situation could summarize the whole thing in an article.

Permalink Reply by DVT on June 12, 2015 at 8:24am

Yeah the whole thing was a lot of shouting then it seemed to fizzle out.

Permalink Reply by Rich on June 12, 2015 at 8:27am

I believe Manning essentially runs AFTAL, which is why he was never ousted. I'm guessing UACC was either too confused or disinterested by the matter, or there's a personal friendship in the mix. That being said, the UACC doesn't seem to run run the tightest ship with the registered dealer program, so it doesn't blow me away that he's still in the mix.

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on June 12, 2015 at 8:34am