We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

I apologize for the quality of the picture. This photo was supposedly signed in 1963. John and Paul's signatures are hard to see but Ringo and George's are fairly legible. In any case they look off to me. Opinions?

Views: 345

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

the beatles did not sign this

Terrier is correct....this was not signed by The Beatles...

Not a chance.
A nice Neil set.

It looks like a Neil set to me too.

Ha ha that was my initial thoughts based on the George and Ringo but I wasn't confident enough to put that out there.

I agree. not signed by the Beatles. Strong likeness to Neil's signatures. Whoever it was originally signed for actually had a photo from a series taken and used for publicity, magazines etc and maybe a concert program.  

I don't that that they are 'Neils' at all but I guess that is secondary to the fact that they are not genuine.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service