Beatles Autographs From June, 1967 - Opinions? - Autograph Live2024-03-28T22:54:54Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/beatles-autographs-from-june-1967-opinions?feed=yes&xn_auth=noAgreed. The only authentic th…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2022-11-18:3524372:Comment:17973552022-11-18T15:12:50.957ZBallroomDays67https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BallroomDays67
<p>Agreed. The only authentic thing I see in that listing is the JSA letter of opinion. The Caiazzo COA appears to be fake. …<br></br><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800657?profile=original" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><img class="align-full" src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800657?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="525"></img></a> <a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800894?profile=original" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><img class="align-full" src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800894?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="525"></img></a></p>
<p>Agreed. The only authentic thing I see in that listing is the JSA letter of opinion. The Caiazzo COA appears to be fake. <br/><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800657?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800657?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="525" class="align-full"/></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800894?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886800894?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="525" class="align-full"/></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886803899?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886811889?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886811889?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="525" class="align-full"/></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886803899?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886812282?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886812282?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="525" class="align-full"/></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886803899?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><br/></a><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/10886803899?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"></a></p> Good old susanna is now tryin…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2022-11-18:3524372:Comment:17973252022-11-18T08:28:33.674ZServihttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Servi
<p>Good old susanna is now trying to sell a fake set, marked as fake but incl a Caiazzo COA. Probably the latter is also fake. See …</p>
<p>Good old susanna is now trying to sell a fake set, marked as fake but incl a Caiazzo COA. Probably the latter is also fake. See <a href="https://www.ebay.nl/itm/225255927352?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=1346-175129-2357-0&ssspo=qZcZkbXgRWi&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=EZHyzxDrS4C&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY" target="_blank">https://www.ebay.nl/itm/225255927352?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=1346-175129-2357-0&ssspo=qZcZkbXgRWi&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=EZHyzxDrS4C&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY</a></p> Good catch, Servi. Thanks for…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2022-11-05:3524372:Comment:17916622022-11-05T15:04:53.762ZBallroomDays67https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BallroomDays67
<p>Good catch, Servi. Thanks for the info. Gee, I wonder why they changed their seller name.</p>
<p>Good catch, Servi. Thanks for the info. Gee, I wonder why they changed their seller name.</p> There's NO way any member wou…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2022-11-05:3524372:Comment:17914562022-11-05T14:43:04.580Zjames congerhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/jamesconger
<p>There's NO way any member would write 67 in 1967 & certainly not Beatles at the top of any signing FACT. All the same hand & FAKE.</p>
<p>There's NO way any member would write 67 in 1967 & certainly not Beatles at the top of any signing FACT. All the same hand & FAKE.</p> Really 67 ? looks 1964 &…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2022-11-05:3524372:Comment:17914532022-11-05T14:39:22.770Zjames congerhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/jamesconger
<p>Really 67 ? looks 1964 & same hand! the 1 supplied by Ballroom later, I'd say not Authentic.</p>
<p>Really 67 ? looks 1964 & same hand! the 1 supplied by Ballroom later, I'd say not Authentic.</p> This seller “susannesusu123”…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2022-11-05:3524372:Comment:17913372022-11-05T09:15:19.160ZServihttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Servi
<p>This seller “susannesusu123” has changed the seller name to “sammlerobjekte” and is offering autographs every now and then, see …</p>
<p>This seller “susannesusu123” has changed the seller name to “sammlerobjekte” and is offering autographs every now and then, see <a rel="nofollow noopener" href="https://www.ebay.com/itm/PAUL-MCCARTNEY-AUTOGRAPH-SIGNED-HIGH-IN-THE-CLOUDS-BOOK-DECEMBER-14-2005-LONDON/225237281262?mkcid=1&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&siteid=0&campid=5338598350&toolid=10001&mkevt=1&ul_ref=https://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1&fbclid=IwAR2gD0PgypaFl4pFC-hljetrg58EhLtDDlEw2hAvp73cJBH-pGG75nDoHa8&ul_noapp=true&pageci=bb390ca7-ee8a-4c4e-96c3-50c8bd5054ce&redirect=mobile" target="_blank">https://www.ebay.com/itm/PAUL-MCCARTNEY-AUTOGRAPH-SIGNED-HIGH-IN-TH...</a></p>
<p>Look at the feedback of sammlerobjekte: identical to that of “susannesusu123” (see the post by Bruce Juice on page 2 of this thread).</p>
<p>And read this thread:</p>
<p> <a rel="nofollow noopener" href="https://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/john-lennon-signed-promo-copy-double-fantasy-real?id=3524372%3ATopic%3A1636183&page=1#comments" target="_blank">https://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/john-lennon-signed-...</a></p>
<p>Search for susannesusu123 on google, and note that some buyers complained the this seller also sold fake stamps..</p> Exactly!!!tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2021-05-12:3524372:Comment:16299942021-05-12T12:35:45.857ZJim Cushmanhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JimCushman
<p>Exactly!!!</p>
<p>Exactly!!!</p> Yes, there is a reason. Someo…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2021-05-12:3524372:Comment:16300732021-05-12T03:41:02.003ZBallroomDays67https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BallroomDays67
<p>Yes, there is a reason. Someone thinks that they’re getting an authentic set at a bargain price. What they’re actually getting is ripped off by a scammer.</p>
<p>Yes, there is a reason. Someone thinks that they’re getting an authentic set at a bargain price. What they’re actually getting is ripped off by a scammer.</p> If it's a live ink signatures…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2021-05-12:3524372:Comment:16298582021-05-12T00:11:18.013ZJamnick Jarmshttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JamnickJarms
<div class="mail-message expanded" id="m1927883498830574258"><div class="mail-message-content collapsible zoom-normal mail-show-images"><div class="clear"><div dir="ltr">If it's a live ink signatures, then it's legitimate to mention that. I think on Ebay you can only take original or reproduction in the item specifics.<br></br>The provenance is misleading, I agree.<br></br>But again, there will be a reason why $1250 was paid for it. …</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="m1927883498830574258" class="mail-message expanded"><div class="mail-message-content collapsible zoom-normal mail-show-images"><div class="clear"><div dir="ltr">If it's a live ink signatures, then it's legitimate to mention that. I think on Ebay you can only take original or reproduction in the item specifics.<br/>The provenance is misleading, I agree.<br/>But again, there will be a reason why $1250 was paid for it. </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="mail-message-footer spacer collapsible"></div>
</div> You seem to be under the impr…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2021-05-12:3524372:Comment:16297562021-05-12T00:01:00.978ZBallroomDays67https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BallroomDays67
<p>You seem to be under the impression that it’s appropriate to describe a forgery or secretarial signature as being a “reproduction.” In any case, they’re described as being live ink signatures with specific provenance. It’s intentionally misleading.</p>
<p>You seem to be under the impression that it’s appropriate to describe a forgery or secretarial signature as being a “reproduction.” In any case, they’re described as being live ink signatures with specific provenance. It’s intentionally misleading.</p>