Boris Karloff Cut Autograph - Autograph Live2024-03-29T09:54:58Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/bella-lugosi-cut-autograph?feed=yes&xn_auth=notag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-22:3524372:Comment:11089102017-08-22T16:59:14.190ZJim Cushmanhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JimCushman
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54774678?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54774678?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721" class="align-full"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54774678?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54774678?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721" class="align-full"/></a></p> I have no idea what you're re…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11083982017-08-21T21:30:19.464ZBob Salvatihttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BobSalvati
<p>I have no idea what you're referring to...</p>
<p>I have no idea what you're referring to...</p> No, you wouldn't think that's…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11084772017-08-21T21:02:08.971ZWoody2Shoeshttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Woody2Shoes
<p>No, you wouldn't think that's what sucks the most about this hobby if you ever saw a Coach's Corner auction. 8o)</p>
<p>No, you wouldn't think that's what sucks the most about this hobby if you ever saw a Coach's Corner auction. 8o)</p> I'll tell a story now. The la…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11083112017-08-21T20:45:53.492ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>I'll tell a story now. The last Gleason I found for a client was stapled, in 1945, inside a playbill. The signature was Gleason's, in pencil, and the brown kraft type paper had left reverse acidic stains on the opposing pages as well as corresponding rust marks from the staples. I don't think there was much "opinion" in play here. This is why I like so many different qualities and features of an autograph, such as dedications and inscriptions. But it could have all of this - it must be…</p>
<p>I'll tell a story now. The last Gleason I found for a client was stapled, in 1945, inside a playbill. The signature was Gleason's, in pencil, and the brown kraft type paper had left reverse acidic stains on the opposing pages as well as corresponding rust marks from the staples. I don't think there was much "opinion" in play here. This is why I like so many different qualities and features of an autograph, such as dedications and inscriptions. But it could have all of this - it must be Gleason's hand. I don't think it has to be opinions, there are many other textures to feel to help reach a conclusion of authorship.</p> No, I didn't see the rejectio…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11082362017-08-21T20:39:00.560ZBob Salvatihttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BobSalvati
<p>No, I didn't see the rejection letter because I didn't want to even see it, I was so upset. The buyer made the right decision thankfully. I've never submitted anything to TPA's either, never will.</p>
<p></p>
<p>No, I didn't see the rejection letter because I didn't want to even see it, I was so upset. The buyer made the right decision thankfully. I've never submitted anything to TPA's either, never will.</p>
<p></p> Well, I do not place much sto…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11082352017-08-21T20:34:27.909ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Well, I do not place much stock in some of <em>those</em> opinions, I agree. I have my own based on experience, observation and logic, as I am sure many do. Did you see the letter of rejection? I don't play the TPG games and have never submitted anything in my life. It would be a remarkable feat indeed to create a cancelled 1/21/51 UPSP postcard signed in the correct fountain pen <em>in Gleason's specific hand</em>, knowing his secretarials, bearing the age and other marks that serve to…</p>
<p>Well, I do not place much stock in some of <em>those</em> opinions, I agree. I have my own based on experience, observation and logic, as I am sure many do. Did you see the letter of rejection? I don't play the TPG games and have never submitted anything in my life. It would be a remarkable feat indeed to create a cancelled 1/21/51 UPSP postcard signed in the correct fountain pen <em>in Gleason's specific hand</em>, knowing his secretarials, bearing the age and other marks that serve to indicate authenticity.</p> To my point, Eric, here's a t…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11082342017-08-21T20:21:59.650ZBob Salvatihttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BobSalvati
<p>To my point, Eric, here's a true short story that must be happening every day to countless items. I bought a signed Beach Boys album by 4 many years ago from R&R. Did my own research as well and I was 100% comfortable with the sigs. A few months ago I sold it with the R&R cert. Two weeks later the buyer told me that he sent it to PSA and they did not pass it and told him that all of the sigs were off. What, lol.?? I was super p*ssed. Instead of returning it for a refund the buyer…</p>
<p>To my point, Eric, here's a true short story that must be happening every day to countless items. I bought a signed Beach Boys album by 4 many years ago from R&R. Did my own research as well and I was 100% comfortable with the sigs. A few months ago I sold it with the R&R cert. Two weeks later the buyer told me that he sent it to PSA and they did not pass it and told him that all of the sigs were off. What, lol.?? I was super p*ssed. Instead of returning it for a refund the buyer decided to keep it. All boils down to opinions.</p> I disagree. You do not have t…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11083072017-08-21T19:43:16.523ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>I disagree. You do not have to have seen Jackie Gleason sign a USPs postcard mailed 1/21/51 if you know his secretaries etc. to identify his hand.</p>
<p></p>
<p>I don't know the history of this item but it reminds me of newer ink on older paper whose sizing has gone.</p>
<p>I disagree. You do not have to have seen Jackie Gleason sign a USPs postcard mailed 1/21/51 if you know his secretaries etc. to identify his hand.</p>
<p></p>
<p>I don't know the history of this item but it reminds me of newer ink on older paper whose sizing has gone.</p> You're very welcome. It's jus…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11083002017-08-21T18:53:09.919ZBob Salvatihttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BobSalvati
<p>You're very welcome. It's just an opinion which means I could be right or I could be wrong. Unless you get an autograph yourself in-person, it all comes down to opinions. That's what s*cks so much about this hobby.</p>
<p>You're very welcome. It's just an opinion which means I could be right or I could be wrong. Unless you get an autograph yourself in-person, it all comes down to opinions. That's what s*cks so much about this hobby.</p> Thank you for your opinion.tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-08-21:3524372:Comment:11083852017-08-21T18:39:52.682ZDean Ziechhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/DeanZiech
<p>Thank you for your opinion.</p>
<p>Thank you for your opinion.</p>