David Bowie - Autograph Live2024-03-29T15:15:13Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/david-bowie-11?feed=yes&xn_auth=noBest wishes looks to "round"…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-05-26:3524372:Comment:13479142019-05-26T16:05:58.607ZTheThinWhiteDukehttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Milwal
<p>Best wishes looks to "round" to me. He writes much more in a sharpe style </p>
<p>Best wishes looks to "round" to me. He writes much more in a sharpe style </p> I do not like it for some rea…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-05-26:3524372:Comment:13479102019-05-26T15:45:40.003ZSaraPolanskahttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/SaraPolanska
<p>I do not like it for some reason. Especially writting in best wishes. Its so smooth and more like womans writting... </p>
<p>I do not like it for some reason. Especially writting in best wishes. Its so smooth and more like womans writting... </p> Legible inscriptions and so o…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-05-26:3524372:Comment:13477312019-05-26T15:40:09.724ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Legible inscriptions and so on often indicate secretarials but I am unaware of any from that period or after - just the ones I mentioned. After C. 1980 it is either forgery or genuine. This inscription does look familiar to me though...this hand...</p>
<p>Legible inscriptions and so on often indicate secretarials but I am unaware of any from that period or after - just the ones I mentioned. After C. 1980 it is either forgery or genuine. This inscription does look familiar to me though...this hand...</p> Thanks Eric. I totally agree…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-05-26:3524372:Comment:13479072019-05-26T15:36:17.023ZTim Malehttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/TimMale
<p>Thanks Eric. I totally agree it doesn't look right. Bubbly is a good word. Numerals are off too. It's the inscription that made me think maybe secretarial. Looks familiar. Not Bowie's handwriting though. </p>
<p>Thanks Eric. I totally agree it doesn't look right. Bubbly is a good word. Numerals are off too. It's the inscription that made me think maybe secretarial. Looks familiar. Not Bowie's handwriting though. </p> That is not a recognized secr…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-05-26:3524372:Comment:13477262019-05-26T15:17:05.708ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>That is not a recognized secretarial style (those only appear "rarely" and much earlier - generally 1973-76 and some 1980. Those would be by Ken Pitt, Cherry Vanilla and some by Corrine Schwab - this information only came to light in March/April of this year, recently confirmed by Bowie's camp. Bowie preferred to sign himself when possible - where did you hear this might be a secretarial style from such a late date? I don't like it though - too smooth and bubbly for me. However, '89 is more…</p>
<p>That is not a recognized secretarial style (those only appear "rarely" and much earlier - generally 1973-76 and some 1980. Those would be by Ken Pitt, Cherry Vanilla and some by Corrine Schwab - this information only came to light in March/April of this year, recently confirmed by Bowie's camp. Bowie preferred to sign himself when possible - where did you hear this might be a secretarial style from such a late date? I don't like it though - too smooth and bubbly for me. However, '89 is more MarkG's territory.</p>