Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on August 19, 2016 at 11:12am

Looks good to me!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on August 19, 2016 at 11:33am

I was gonna say not genuine...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xwiesy on August 19, 2016 at 11:49am

If that isnt good, thats a terrific forgery.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xwiesy on August 19, 2016 at 11:50am

On second thought it feels off.

I would love to hear Roger's opinion on that.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Finlay on August 19, 2016 at 11:51am

Can people say specifically what looks off? Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 19, 2016 at 11:51am

Isn't this consistent with fakes that were posted here?

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/fake-fleetwood-mac-a...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Finlay on August 19, 2016 at 12:06pm

Which ones are supposed to be the fakes? The ones in the image at the top? They all look good to me. Why are they deemed fakes I wonder?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 19, 2016 at 1:19pm

I agree with ballroom, there is a mistake in the Nicks signature that is typical of this forgery style.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Finlay on August 19, 2016 at 1:23pm

Thanks. May I ask what the mistake is and how is a forgery "style" noticeable exactly?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on August 19, 2016 at 1:29pm

The forgers are reading along.
The tell tales shouldn't be revealed here.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on August 19, 2016 at 5:51pm

+1

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xwiesy on August 19, 2016 at 12:29pm

Couple good ones for comparison.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpeg, 1.1 MB

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page