Hey Guys, 

Any opinions on this signed photo?

Views: 96

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Provided they're not stamped,  the autographs look pretty good to me.

The part that bothers me the most is the extended lower portion of the M in Mantle.

Steve, look at this Autograph. Look at the M in Mantle.

Steve, I totally get what you're saying, I sometimes split hairs with an autograph. But if you look at the autograph as a whole, the fluidity, and other things that make it genuine. If that's not authentic, it's definitely one of the better forgeries  I've seen. I still think it's fine. It's funny, you pointed to the mantle, I was looking at the "a" in DiMaggio, that looks like an e and  although I believe wholeheartedly it's authentic, it certainly caught my eye. DiMeggio. Lol. Hopefully, everybody else will chime in.

The e in DiMaggio caught my eye too, but didn’t bother me because I have an in person signed like that.

the signatures are authentic.  As long as live ink.

Absolutely authentic.

I like it too! I would like to get my grubby chubby paws on this one myself. You don't see a ton of those around with the cheesy 1980's plaque that are authentic. I think the cheesy plaque is also a good sign in this case. If it's not a photo copy it's a score.

You can usually take one out easily, as Steve Zarelli's video shows you.


I cant say on the Mantle, but the DiMaggio looks very close to my PSA Authentic one I own. 

Williams looks good too. 



  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2020   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service