Pink Floyd - Autograph Live2024-03-28T12:34:39Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/pink-floyd?commentId=3524372%3AComment%3A1309913&x=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noSeamus,
I re-read my response…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-31:3524372:Comment:13099132019-01-31T21:05:21.854ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Seamus,</p>
<p>I re-read my response. My tone was way off. I am sorry - it did <em>not</em> come out the way I intended at all.</p>
<p>Best always,</p>
<p>Eric</p>
<p>Seamus,</p>
<p>I re-read my response. My tone was way off. I am sorry - it did <em>not</em> come out the way I intended at all.</p>
<p>Best always,</p>
<p>Eric</p> "...Can I not respond to your…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13095402019-01-30T15:50:29.141ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>"...<span>Can I not respond to your notations or I am forced to simply view comparisons between live ink and a preprint?..."</span></p>
<p><span>With all respect, you can do what you wish - I am out of the running right now. I noted the impression and I note the ink which appears flat/even. I leave the rest to you.</span></p>
<p>"...<span>Can I not respond to your notations or I am forced to simply view comparisons between live ink and a preprint?..."</span></p>
<p><span>With all respect, you can do what you wish - I am out of the running right now. I noted the impression and I note the ink which appears flat/even. I leave the rest to you.</span></p> Can I not respond to your not…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13096872019-01-30T13:33:50.983ZCorey Moylanhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/CoreyMoylan
<p>Can I not respond to your notations or I am forced to simply view comparisons between live ink and a preprint? I never use preprints as exemplars as there’s much you cannot tell about the signatures in a print. Regardless, there are enough comparisons to have little concern. </p>
<p><span>With respect to pressure, I also have no issues. For one example of the four, look at Rogers tail to his last name and how he lifts/skips the pen with the finish. You still see that in his current…</span></p>
<p>Can I not respond to your notations or I am forced to simply view comparisons between live ink and a preprint? I never use preprints as exemplars as there’s much you cannot tell about the signatures in a print. Regardless, there are enough comparisons to have little concern. </p>
<p><span>With respect to pressure, I also have no issues. For one example of the four, look at Rogers tail to his last name and how he lifts/skips the pen with the finish. You still see that in his current signature, it’s quite common in his quick attack approach.</span></p>
<p>This set was obviously signed when the paper was on a hard flat surface, thus creating overall consistency, but overall flow / formation / and pressure is consistent to each style</p> My notations are for observat…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13096652019-01-30T05:51:24.488ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>My notations <em>are for observation only</em>. I need rest at this time. </p>
<p>My notations <em>are for observation only</em>. I need rest at this time. </p> Seamus, I just mentioned the…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13096062019-01-30T05:19:01.489ZSteve Cyrkin, Adminhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/SteveCyrkin
<p>Seamus, I just mentioned the one thing I noticed that seemed unusually similar, but Roger's set showed it was only a coincidence.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Seamus, I just mentioned the one thing I noticed that seemed unusually similar, but Roger's set showed it was only a coincidence.</p>
<p></p> Yes, I am still here and stil…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13094472019-01-30T05:17:58.036ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Yes, I am still here and still kicking :)</p>
<p>Look at these in this context 1971 stylistically:</p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/920687624?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/920687624?profile=RESIZE_710x" class="align-left"/></a></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Yes, I am still here and still kicking :)</p>
<p>Look at these in this context 1971 stylistically:</p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/920687624?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/920687624?profile=RESIZE_710x" class="align-left"/></a></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p> you must be feeling bettergoo…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13096022019-01-30T05:10:15.874Zgoodcathttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/goodcat53
<p>you must be feeling better<br/>good to see you're still posting mate</p>
<p>you must be feeling better<br/>good to see you're still posting mate</p> This appears as the others to…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-30:3524372:Comment:13095142019-01-30T05:08:00.123ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>This appears as the others to me - quite different. And pen pressure...</p>
<p>We agree to disagree. :)</p>
<p>This appears as the others to me - quite different. And pen pressure...</p>
<p>We agree to disagree. :)</p> Steve - do you have any other…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-29:3524372:Comment:13091372019-01-29T09:42:03.042ZCorey Moylanhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/CoreyMoylan
<p>Steve - do you have any other evidence to support your claim it was signed by one person other than the fact that the formation of one letter is ‘similar’?</p>
<p>No one has provided any like exemplars with explanations other than myself. At this point it seems like people made up their mind based on one letter. How about this 74/75 example...pretty similar ‘d’ ‘t’ huh?…</p>
<p></p>
<p>Steve - do you have any other evidence to support your claim it was signed by one person other than the fact that the formation of one letter is ‘similar’?</p>
<p>No one has provided any like exemplars with explanations other than myself. At this point it seems like people made up their mind based on one letter. How about this 74/75 example...pretty similar ‘d’ ‘t’ huh?</p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/913930500?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/913930500?profile=RESIZE_710x" class="align-left"/></a></p>
<p></p> +2tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2019-01-29:3524372:Comment:13091162019-01-29T02:20:34.962ZShaggy67https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Shaggy67
<p>+2</p>
<p>+2</p>