Queen - signed Kind Of Magic album fully signed - Autograph Live2024-03-29T06:22:01Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/queen-signed-kind-of-magic-album-fully-signed?feed=yes&xn_auth=noSorry to say Brian, but that…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-11-16:3524372:Comment:12801222018-11-16T07:06:10.830ZInnuendohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MercuryMan
<p>Sorry to say Brian, but that item is a secretarial and not signed by the band. I wish I had better news for you. </p>
<p>Sorry to say Brian, but that item is a secretarial and not signed by the band. I wish I had better news for you. </p> I have this. Won it for being…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-11-16:3524372:Comment:12801182018-11-16T06:51:05.214ZBrian Pricehttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BrianPrice
<p>I have this. Won it for being one of the callers who made it in the air to a call-in show Brian and Roger were on. It wasn’t “Rockline”, but I can’t remember which it was. So I’m assuming the signatures are real. But for all I know, Jacky Gunn could have signed Freddie’s name. Brian’s sig looks spot on. I’m never selling it, but lit would be nice to know if it’s real.</p>
<p>I have this. Won it for being one of the callers who made it in the air to a call-in show Brian and Roger were on. It wasn’t “Rockline”, but I can’t remember which it was. So I’m assuming the signatures are real. But for all I know, Jacky Gunn could have signed Freddie’s name. Brian’s sig looks spot on. I’m never selling it, but lit would be nice to know if it’s real.</p> I never said my first argueme…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12078642018-05-15T14:04:36.961ZInnuendohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MercuryMan
<p>I never said my first arguement was about the D and the line. You claimed these 2 items are "identical" and I showed you that they weren't by using the the D and the line as an example. I'm not going to keep arguing with you buddy. It's what you want. I've stated the facts multiple times already. Like your original post, when someone tells you something you dont want to hear, you get upset and ask for more info. I've provided enough. Believe what you like but I'll continue to judge Queen…</p>
<p>I never said my first arguement was about the D and the line. You claimed these 2 items are "identical" and I showed you that they weren't by using the the D and the line as an example. I'm not going to keep arguing with you buddy. It's what you want. I've stated the facts multiple times already. Like your original post, when someone tells you something you dont want to hear, you get upset and ask for more info. I've provided enough. Believe what you like but I'll continue to judge Queen autographs based on my 40 years of experience. I give my opinions for free to help others out as an experikeces collector, not an authenticator. Ive provided examples on this forum thousands of times. I'm not going to spend another 5 minutes hunting down another example for you, friend. Theres more then enough proof already posted here. Your item and his are not the same. Have a nice day. </p> I could believe.. "it's bad…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12078032018-05-15T13:49:44.595Ztmbawayhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/tmbaway
<pre class="tw-data-text tw-ta tw-text-medium" dir="ltr"></pre>
I could believe.. "it's bad faith???" :) Please innuendo , your first arguments was not "the D to the line", it was that john never sign with just a D.. ( too simple for you and i was agree with you), There many examples of genius autographs with De..but no one with just a "D"or please show me an genius example..it would be more honest to say that mine may be good and not "absolutly fake" ^^ it's more logical but i'm probably wrong…
<pre class="tw-data-text tw-ta tw-text-medium" dir="ltr"></pre>
I could believe.. "it's bad faith???" :) Please innuendo , your first arguments was not "the D to the line", it was that john never sign with just a D.. ( too simple for you and i was agree with you), There many examples of genius autographs with De..but no one with just a "D"or please show me an genius example..it would be more honest to say that mine may be good and not "absolutly fake" ^^ it's more logical but i'm probably wrong :) You keep saying your john was…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12078022018-05-15T13:22:18.891ZInnuendohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MercuryMan
<p>You keep saying your john was identical to his. Have a look at them compared. They are absolutely not identical. From the D to the line, nothings the same. Hope this photo will mean something since my words dont lol.<a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54789568?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54789568?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721" class="align-full"/></a> </p>
<p>You keep saying your john was identical to his. Have a look at them compared. They are absolutely not identical. From the D to the line, nothings the same. Hope this photo will mean something since my words dont lol.<a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54789568?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54789568?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721" class="align-full"/></a> </p> My words are the same as they…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12076562018-05-15T13:16:46.747ZInnuendohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MercuryMan
<p>My words are the same as they were then. I dont know how else to explain this to you, friend. Your item had multiple issues. More than one. John was atypical and not "identical" to this one anyway. Martin's john is atypical but also includes 3 other genuine signatures and an additional year added by John. Meaning theres more proof its genuine atypical. Yours looked wrong and had other signatures with other issues. Your john doesnt match this one exactly, nor does it include the extra year…</p>
<p>My words are the same as they were then. I dont know how else to explain this to you, friend. Your item had multiple issues. More than one. John was atypical and not "identical" to this one anyway. Martin's john is atypical but also includes 3 other genuine signatures and an additional year added by John. Meaning theres more proof its genuine atypical. Yours looked wrong and had other signatures with other issues. Your john doesnt match this one exactly, nor does it include the extra year added to his signature to judge. </p> Thanks innuendo for your answ…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12078012018-05-15T13:07:29.131Ztmbawayhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/tmbaway
<p>Thanks innuendo for your answer, but i'm sorry "words mean something"..your opinion about mine john's signature was clear : "<span>the Deacon is wrong as its much too simple even for a rushed John. The John looks ok, but I've seen many forgers get the first part of John correct so I'm assuming it isn't hard to fake. The deacon tells me it's bad... the John is absolutely fake ". OK, so now, for you, </span><span lang="en" xml:lang="en">if the others signatures seem good a " John atypical…</span></p>
<p>Thanks innuendo for your answer, but i'm sorry "words mean something"..your opinion about mine john's signature was clear : "<span>the Deacon is wrong as its much too simple even for a rushed John. The John looks ok, but I've seen many forgers get the first part of John correct so I'm assuming it isn't hard to fake. The deacon tells me it's bad... the John is absolutely fake ". OK, so now, for you, </span><span lang="en" xml:lang="en">if the others signatures seem good a " John atypical rushed , too simple and "ABSOLUTLY FAKE "(it's your words) signature" ,identical to mine, become true..it's just curious ^^</span></p> thank you for your reply, Inn…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12075592018-05-15T12:11:46.386ZMartinhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Martin787
<p style="text-align: left;">thank you for your reply, Innuendo. COA from Roger will be added now. Wow... such an COA is another 45$. Anyway, Im going to sell it one day.... might need the $ for my own uocoming album very soon</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">thank you for your reply, Innuendo. COA from Roger will be added now. Wow... such an COA is another 45$. Anyway, Im going to sell it one day.... might need the $ for my own uocoming album very soon</p> The item is fine, Martin. Tmb…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12076522018-05-15T12:00:08.392ZInnuendohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MercuryMan
<p>The item is fine, Martin. Tmbaway did not mention the rest of my concerns about his item. I told him his john was fake because it was atypical AND his item had other issues with other signatures and a few others agreed. </p>
<p>The item is fine, Martin. Tmbaway did not mention the rest of my concerns about his item. I told him his john was fake because it was atypical AND his item had other issues with other signatures and a few others agreed. </p> Now I understand what you're…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-05-15:3524372:Comment:12075572018-05-15T11:53:34.658ZInnuendohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MercuryMan
<p>Now I understand what you're referring to! It IS atypical, tmbaway. It was rare but it did occur in genuine John signatures. Please keep in mind that even with a simple john, Martin's item had 3 other rushed (obviously) genuine signatures. Meaning there isn't a reason to question the rare john here. Martin's also included more to judge with the year added. Matches John's hand. </p>
<p>Now I understand what you're referring to! It IS atypical, tmbaway. It was rare but it did occur in genuine John signatures. Please keep in mind that even with a simple john, Martin's item had 3 other rushed (obviously) genuine signatures. Meaning there isn't a reason to question the rare john here. Martin's also included more to judge with the year added. Matches John's hand. </p>