I've gone back and forth on this one a bit to be honest. The o and g and its transition bother me. The formation of the last name also bothers me.
However, after looking at it again - in totality, I would lean authentic, however, not something I would want in my collection.
I see enough good to outweigh bad. I am guilty at times for being over analytical, but I think this one is fine. It has the majority of points I look for. I don't place too much weight on seller as I firmly believe ink doesn't lie, but should be a consideration into total perspective.
It's gotta look as it should. Sweet Rhapsody.
"...I firmly believe ink doesn't lie..."
Come on now, that is hysterical. You know it. I don't want to get into this.
Since Eric keeps wanting to hold this over my mind whenever he has the chance, I'll state it here now - I accidently sold him a preprinted signature. I did not look to see before I sent him it and that was my mistake. Once we confirmed it was indeed a preprint, I immediately refunded him and it was settled. End of story.
I stand behind everything I have said so far in this thread. Take it for what you want - its my opinion as an educated Floyd collector.
"We " did not confirm anything. You were educated. I said, I do NOT want to get into this.
I had no intention of ever mentioning this. Why you have is unclear to me and that is OK. Yes, you got in first, but...to what end...if I show scans... Wot's...uh the deal?
I know you know I don't give a XXXX.
Really, let's not. Really.
"...I am guilty at times for being over analytical..."
Really. I seriously suggest we drop this NOW.