Star Trek cast. Nimoy and Kelley help please. - Autograph Live2024-03-28T21:36:15Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/star-trek-cast-nimoy-and-kelley-help-please-1?commentId=3524372%3AComment%3A1248244&xg_source=activity&feed=yes&xn_auth=noI passed on the photo in the…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-25:3524372:Comment:12484302018-08-25T04:58:22.993Zchris boudreauhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/chrisboudreau
<p>I passed on the photo in the original post with the Shatner being off and I really had no interest in the two plaques. They were part of the deal. I’m looking at the others a little more closely. I’ve always wanted a full cast photo from TOS. Those pictures you posted of the vintage graphs are great. Someday I will look into some more vintage stuff. </p>
<p>I passed on the photo in the original post with the Shatner being off and I really had no interest in the two plaques. They were part of the deal. I’m looking at the others a little more closely. I’ve always wanted a full cast photo from TOS. Those pictures you posted of the vintage graphs are great. Someday I will look into some more vintage stuff. </p> Considering the difference in…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12484832018-08-24T22:20:52.249ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Considering the difference in quality that is a reasonable suggestion. The other sets shown seem far more attractive and well-signed with contrast and placement. The Shatner here is just too deficient IMO.</p>
<p>Considering the difference in quality that is a reasonable suggestion. The other sets shown seem far more attractive and well-signed with contrast and placement. The Shatner here is just too deficient IMO.</p> Fading I am certain would aff…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12482472018-08-24T22:14:25.577ZScott Paulhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/ScottPaul
<p>Fading I am certain would affect the red pigments in the photograph and it does not seem to be the case here. I would vote for pen problems or perhaps another photograph was placed on top and ink lifted. Maybe this was a discarded QVC that someone "saved?" Perhaps that is why there is no COA. Not sure but a possible explanation.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Fading I am certain would affect the red pigments in the photograph and it does not seem to be the case here. I would vote for pen problems or perhaps another photograph was placed on top and ink lifted. Maybe this was a discarded QVC that someone "saved?" Perhaps that is why there is no COA. Not sure but a possible explanation.</p>
<p></p> Well, I just can't get behind…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12484822018-08-24T22:02:14.344ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Well, I just can't get behind the OP 1st image. I suggest a stronger set. Or a vintage set! :D This was all bought on eBay back when this sort of thing could be had for a few dollars each. Click for larger image:</p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343286?profile=original" target="_self"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343286?profile=original" width="603" class="align-left"/></a></p>
<p>Well, I just can't get behind the OP 1st image. I suggest a stronger set. Or a vintage set! :D This was all bought on eBay back when this sort of thing could be had for a few dollars each. Click for larger image:</p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343286?profile=original" target="_self"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343286?profile=original" width="603" class="align-left"/></a></p> Is Shatner really faded or wa…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12484752018-08-24T21:53:06.711ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Is Shatner really faded or was it just the pen? Shatner sig is pretty key in such a context. Along with the other 2 or 3. Great <em>price</em> fades though... </p>
<p>Is Shatner really faded or was it just the pen? Shatner sig is pretty key in such a context. Along with the other 2 or 3. Great <em>price</em> fades though... </p> Hi Cris,
perhaps I am too use…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12482442018-08-24T21:46:27.524ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>Hi Cris,</p>
<p>perhaps I am too used to the vintage sigs, but I did start collecting the modern ones first - the OP 1st just look atypical to me - the last Nimoy also. I recall my friend could never sell most of his QVC Nimoy comics which were abbreviated scribbles in the case in Nimoy and most of his other stuff also - atypical. I also think some of the pictures had screws going through the corners into the plaques - things like that. If these are old school paint pen and they are…</p>
<p>Hi Cris,</p>
<p>perhaps I am too used to the vintage sigs, but I did start collecting the modern ones first - the OP 1st just look atypical to me - the last Nimoy also. I recall my friend could never sell most of his QVC Nimoy comics which were abbreviated scribbles in the case in Nimoy and most of his other stuff also - atypical. I also think some of the pictures had screws going through the corners into the plaques - things like that. If these are old school paint pen and they are <em>not</em> with mat - they could be stuck. I recall the older plaques were simple screw down affairs right to the sig. These appear matted thankfully.</p>
<p>I will also add I can not read much of anything from a photo of a photo in a photo of a screen.</p> Thanks Eric. That’s the one t…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12484712018-08-24T21:37:31.748Zchris boudreauhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/chrisboudreau
<p>Thanks Eric. That’s the one thing I don’t like about it. The marker isn’t the greatest and the Shatner is partially faded, but the price is great. What you think of the other two I posted?</p>
<p>Thanks Eric. That’s the one thing I don’t like about it. The marker isn’t the greatest and the Shatner is partially faded, but the price is great. What you think of the other two I posted?</p> So many appear slightly atypi…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12482972018-08-24T20:52:26.139ZEric Keith Longohttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Eric947
<p>So many appear slightly atypical to me in that first image - I had a friend who used to buy this Trek stuff like this from QVC, photos and comics - and so many were so atypical from signers fatigue...rushed and odd. That and the paint pen skipping so much here. I would pass on the OP. For whatever reason, for me, I don't like it. </p>
<p>So many appear slightly atypical to me in that first image - I had a friend who used to buy this Trek stuff like this from QVC, photos and comics - and so many were so atypical from signers fatigue...rushed and odd. That and the paint pen skipping so much here. I would pass on the OP. For whatever reason, for me, I don't like it. </p> Thanks for chiming in Scott.…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12481002018-08-24T15:31:51.182Zchris boudreauhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/chrisboudreau
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343239?profile=original" target="_self"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343239?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721"></img></a> Thanks for chiming in Scott. I know the cast photos were produced back in the early 90’s for Star Trek’s 25th anniversary I believe. The were produced by scoreboard and catch a star collectables with permission from paramount studios and were limited to 2500 and were sold on the QVC. They usually have a catch a star coa. I’ve added a couple more to compare to. The individual…</p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343239?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343239?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721" class="align-full"/></a>Thanks for chiming in Scott. I know the cast photos were produced back in the early 90’s for Star Trek’s 25th anniversary I believe. The were produced by scoreboard and catch a star collectables with permission from paramount studios and were limited to 2500 and were sold on the QVC. They usually have a catch a star coa. I’ve added a couple more to compare to. The individual Nimoy and Kelley I’ve never seen. They are a plaque and they seem to have been produced at the same time by the same company. <a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343232?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/110343232?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721" class="align-full"/></a></p> I agree with Eric the first o…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2018-08-24:3524372:Comment:12480942018-08-24T12:16:30.885ZScott Paulhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/ScottPaul
<p>I agree with Eric the first one is unusual. Without seeing it in person I would say that it looks wonderful. This is one time I would like to know the full back story of when it was signed and if all seven were present for the signing. This one must have been for a special occasion or for a special person. For a random collector to get seven people to sign in the same pen and the same angle perfectly below their image is great feat. </p>
<p>I agree with Eric the first one is unusual. Without seeing it in person I would say that it looks wonderful. This is one time I would like to know the full back story of when it was signed and if all seven were present for the signing. This one must have been for a special occasion or for a special person. For a random collector to get seven people to sign in the same pen and the same angle perfectly below their image is great feat. </p>