The Rolling Stones on german postcard? - Autograph Live2024-03-29T15:44:32Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/the-rolling-stones-on-german-postcard?feed=yes&xn_auth=noOk, thank you anyway! At leas…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11353882017-11-10T18:51:05.231ZSpencerhill95https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Spencerhill95
Ok, thank you anyway! At least it was free, guess now I know why... the next couple of days I will post further authenticity requests, all autographs from the same collector. I'm curious how often I got fooled
Ok, thank you anyway! At least it was free, guess now I know why... the next couple of days I will post further authenticity requests, all autographs from the same collector. I'm curious how often I got fooled Didn't want to question your…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11354832017-11-10T18:46:33.057ZSpencerhill95https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Spencerhill95
Didn't want to question your knowledge, I just thought he signed "Richard" because that was the commonly known version of his name. But thank you for your reply!
Didn't want to question your knowledge, I just thought he signed "Richard" because that was the commonly known version of his name. But thank you for your reply! the history around what was p…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11353862017-11-10T18:39:40.579ZNatehttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/NathanWhite
<p>the history around what was placed on album covers and official releases you have stated I will not argue with, but all I can suggest is a bit of extra research into known and genuine late 60s Stones autographs and you will see the vast vast majority of Keiths are signed with the inclusion of a 's'.</p>
<p>the history around what was placed on album covers and official releases you have stated I will not argue with, but all I can suggest is a bit of extra research into known and genuine late 60s Stones autographs and you will see the vast vast majority of Keiths are signed with the inclusion of a 's'.</p> no goodtag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11354802017-11-10T18:26:28.496ZJohn Williamhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JohnBoyle
<p>no good</p>
<p>no good</p> Sorry hate to pop your balloo…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11353092017-11-10T17:54:24.680ZMarkGhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/MarkG
<p>Sorry hate to pop your balloon, its not authentic and the Brian Jones attempt is very poor indeed. </p>
<p>Sorry hate to pop your balloon, its not authentic and the Brian Jones attempt is very poor indeed. </p> That's not true, "In 1963 the…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11354712017-11-10T17:29:22.574ZSpencerhill95https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/Spencerhill95
That's not true, "In 1963 their band manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, dropped the s from Richards' surname believing that "Keith Richard", in his words, 'looked more pop'.[3]:63 In the late 1970s Richards re-established the s in his surname." (Quoted from Wikipedia)
That's not true, "In 1963 their band manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, dropped the s from Richards' surname believing that "Keith Richard", in his words, 'looked more pop'.[3]:63 In the late 1970s Richards re-established the s in his surname." (Quoted from Wikipedia) I wont comment on authenticit…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2017-11-10:3524372:Comment:11351612017-11-10T16:42:27.693ZNatehttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/NathanWhite
I wont comment on authenticity, but a point to note is if it was a late 60s Keith would have signed Richards not Richard.
I wont comment on authenticity, but a point to note is if it was a late 60s Keith would have signed Richards not Richard.