Comments - Doors autograph - real ? - Autograph Live2024-03-28T18:21:44Zhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3524372%3ABlogPost%3A677364&xn_auth=noJosh,
If I had a buck for ev…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-20:3524372:Comment:6809712014-11-20T19:08:24.915ZRichard S. Simonhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/RichardSSimon
<p>Josh, </p>
<p>If I had a buck for everyone who has told me that lie, I could retire now :).</p>
<p></p>
<p>Josh, </p>
<p>If I had a buck for everyone who has told me that lie, I could retire now :).</p>
<p></p> Yep. They were pre-printed. T…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-18:3524372:Comment:6789082014-11-18T07:37:06.029ZJosh Boardhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JoshBoard870
<p>Yep. They were pre-printed. This exactly photo and autographs are even pictured in a Doors book (they look the same, minus the "The Doors" written on it). I once had a guy swearing he got it from a bandmember outside a show at the Fillmore in 1968.</p>
<p>Yep. They were pre-printed. This exactly photo and autographs are even pictured in a Doors book (they look the same, minus the "The Doors" written on it). I once had a guy swearing he got it from a bandmember outside a show at the Fillmore in 1968.</p> I appreciate all of your obse…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-17:3524372:Comment:6782702014-11-17T06:49:05.821ZJason Jameshttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/JasonJames
<p>I appreciate all of your observations; I think I agree w/the pre-printed idea--the signatures for Manzarek & Krieger look too neat and the photo feels smooth around the areas of the signings. It just seems strange that the signatures are in various shades of blue while the photo is black & white; FWIW: there's a handwritten date of 12/67 on the back.</p>
<p>I appreciate all of your observations; I think I agree w/the pre-printed idea--the signatures for Manzarek & Krieger look too neat and the photo feels smooth around the areas of the signings. It just seems strange that the signatures are in various shades of blue while the photo is black & white; FWIW: there's a handwritten date of 12/67 on the back.</p> the band look pre printed or…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-15:3524372:Comment:6776672014-11-15T20:16:07.191ZN.Steigerhttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/NoelleSteigerwald
<p>the band look pre printed or whatever but Jim's looks different. Although, I can't see why they would pre print the band and have him hand sign them. It is likely just faded.</p>
<p></p>
<p>the band look pre printed or whatever but Jim's looks different. Although, I can't see why they would pre print the band and have him hand sign them. It is likely just faded.</p>
<p></p> Exactly right -- I think pre-…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-15:3524372:Comment:6774132014-11-15T18:20:49.183ZBruce Juicehttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BruceJuice
<p>Exactly right -- I think pre-printed. I have been offered these by people who swear they are real.</p>
<p>Exactly right -- I think pre-printed. I have been offered these by people who swear they are real.</p> I've seen these before. They…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-15:3524372:Comment:6773672014-11-15T06:31:14.977ZBallroomDays67https://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/BallroomDays67
<p>I've seen these before. They aren't hand signed autographs, unfortunately. I believe they're either stamped or printed onto the photo.</p>
<p>I've seen these before. They aren't hand signed autographs, unfortunately. I believe they're either stamped or printed onto the photo.</p> Very interesting to hear wha…tag:live.autographmagazine.com,2014-11-15:3524372:Comment:6771512014-11-15T06:16:55.223ZGregory J V Besthttps://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/GregoryJVBest
<p> Very interesting to hear what others have to say, about the vintage tape look.</p>
<p> Very interesting to hear what others have to say, about the vintage tape look.</p>