We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Views: 1853

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hey Tim, I find good minds change with new data. I hope this happens for us all. :)

exactly right Eric

thank-you

As far as the signature,I don't like it, and as for her signing in the seventies,I find that a bit silly.

+1

This signature does not resemble Madonna's signature from the late 70's right up to 2018

as i said there wouldnt be fan stuff ,all stuff would be like documents as she was a knowbody in 1979 or 1981

+1

+2

You care about the stories- otherwise you cant tell authentic from not authentic.

Have you been graphing Madonna for forty years? No? So how do you know what’s real?

You picked a story you believe on what her sig looks like.

I agree, I also don't take much for stories, but at times they can be very useful as can related data, as with the Monroe 1953 signature style menu and the 1964 taxes and the 1964 logos mentioned in the other Madonna thread. Until the menu was dated, some thought that signature good. 

I just realized, other than a date, or notation of locale, I don't think any of my graphs have "stories" (apart from my IP). I am not looking for stories, I am looking for authentic autographs. Story is one part of a puzzle. So, no stories here. I don't have any certs or COA's either ;)

So you just inherently know what’s good and bad, very interesting lol

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service