Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by mark peterson on July 19, 2011 at 10:40am

The Ringo looks good!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark peterson on July 19, 2011 at 3:37pm

The Ringo was also signed around 2007.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James R. Altmann on July 19, 2011 at 3:16pm

Ringo is authentic - thumbs up. Rolling Stones is not - thumbs down. Something funny however is the fact that the person that was trying to forge the Ronnie Wood signature was actually trying to replicate a Bill Wyman signature. Idiocy and tenacity are sometimes a lethal combination.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on July 21, 2011 at 12:26am

yeah it's real  - looks like the mail versions from 07 or 08

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on July 21, 2011 at 12:28am

Stones piece looks like it was signed using someones foot....maybe even their barefoot.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Josh Board on July 21, 2011 at 12:38am

To me, like everyone else: Ringo looks good, Stones bad.

 

My favorite part of the original post, is that he said "Beatles drummer Ringo Starr," so we don't confuse him with those other Ringo's out there ;-)

• ▶ Reply