We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Any thoughts on this one? There is no third party authentication on it, but I think it looks good? This is the best available photo. Appreciate any and all feedback!

Thanks 

Derek

Views: 103

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm not a Martin expert, but IMO, based on what I've seen that I know to be authentic, the 'B' is off, the starting point fairly atypical, as well as the shape. There's a break between the B and the i, the formation of the "illy", or "ill" (hard to tell which one) is strange, there's two hiccups in the M, which looks unsure, and the 'artin' is off as well, atypically malformed, especially at the end.

Nobody has commented yet so I figured I'd lend my observations and a starting point. .

Thanks Woody. It's definitely more 'articulate' than verified examples I have seen of his in that most of the letters are more/less completely spelled out.

I have one in my collection. More of a rushed, scribbled autograph.

The “B” has me slightly concerned.  Otherwise, it looks pretty typical.

Hmm. I'll do some more thinking on it and try and do a few more comparisons. Thanks everyone for your help!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service