We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Lennon signature
Thoughts on this one?
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by fab432 on
-
Personally I don’t like the look of this one. It lacks the flow of a natural signature.
-
Permalink Reply by Rfitzz on
-
Any further info on this ? or, at least, a photo of the whole document signed ?
-
Permalink Reply by Beatlesfan64 on
-
It’s a piece of paper from a Japanese restaurant in San Francisco.
The seller had it authenticated by PAAS.
-
Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on
-
What's the story with this one???..if there is any
-
-
The owners dad was eating at a Japanese restaurant in San Francisco’ and went over to Lennon and he signed this piece of paper in green ink. That’s all I know
-
-
...size of the paper ? More pictures ? Does the paper behind it have anything to do with it ? Any other info would be helpful...
-
-
Here you go
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
Permalink Reply by Thurston bell on
-
Im on the fence a little with this one. Id think it would pass a tpa.
-
-
Between 1970 and 72
-
-
There's a chance....IMO.
-
-
I agree Jim, there's a chance, but I do have concerns, which is why I keep asking for the size of the paper. It seems a little too "crunched" for a Lennon signature, he normally signed a more flowing, elongated signature when given the space. More of a concern to me, for that time period, he most always signed as one word. Although you see the pen leading up from the "n" in John to begin the "L" in Lennon, normally that is connected resulting in one word. Normally, when signed as two words, Lennon would be below John and the trailing pen would lead downward to the L after the "n". It may still be authentic, but I'd be cautious for this and some other minor concerns. IMO
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
