We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

It's not a clear pic but can you say about its authenticity?

Views: 814

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't like it. Every Warhol I've ever seen, forgeries, imprints, secretarial (like those ghost signed by his mother in the 50s/60s) was far more compact.

I've never seen one with this much spacing in the middle, and so much distance between the start and finish.

The character of his letters is subject to much variation, but one theme I've noted on pieces with strong provenance is that on those, his penmanship was sloppy with poorly formed letters, something you wouldn't expect from an artist.   

I don't like this either.. Andy had a great signature and the start of Andy looks like it was signed in different directions. Usually his was uniformed.

I have a lot of signed items from him and will collate examples and post for comparison.

Thank you so much, i'll be happy to look at your examples for comparison, specially of the same period.

Hi Richard Booth i would like to know your opinion on this one, thanks.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Better. Much more in the Warhol zone than the first one.

Many thanks! Your suggestions and considerations are very useful to me.

This one looks fine!

Many thanks.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service