Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by fab432 on September 7, 2018 at 6:22pm

Personally I don’t like the look of this one.  It lacks the flow of a natural signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rfitzz on September 7, 2018 at 6:26pm

Any further info on this ?  or, at least, a photo of the whole document signed ?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatlesfan64 on September 7, 2018 at 6:39pm

It’s a piece of paper from a Japanese restaurant in San Francisco.  

The seller had it authenticated by PAAS.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 7, 2018 at 7:20pm

What's the story with this one???..if there is any

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatlesfan64 on September 7, 2018 at 7:25pm

The owners dad was eating at a Japanese restaurant in San Francisco’ and went over to Lennon and he signed this piece of paper in green ink. That’s all I know

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rfitzz on September 7, 2018 at 7:26pm

...size of the paper ?  More pictures ?  Does the paper behind it have anything to do with it ? Any other info would be helpful...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatlesfan64 on September 7, 2018 at 7:37pm

Here you go

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• 7343320A-F33E-4C23-ADE2-D939AD89D1C1.png, 1.4 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rfitzz on September 7, 2018 at 9:48pm

Any idea what year this took place ? What size is the paper ?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thurston bell on September 8, 2018 at 1:11am

Im on the fence a little with this one. Id think it would pass a tpa.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatlesfan64 on September 8, 2018 at 3:43am

Between 1970 and 72

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 8, 2018 at 6:26am

There's a chance....IMO.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rfitzz on September 8, 2018 at 11:17am

I agree Jim, there's a chance, but I do have concerns, which is why I keep asking for the size of the paper.  It seems a little too "crunched" for a Lennon signature, he normally signed a more flowing, elongated signature when given the space.  More of a concern to me, for that time period, he most always signed as one word.  Although you see the pen leading up from the "n" in John to begin the "L" in Lennon, normally that is connected resulting in one word. Normally, when signed as two words, Lennon would be below John and the trailing pen would lead downward to the L after the "n".  It may still be authentic, but I'd be cautious for this and some other minor concerns. IMO

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page