We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Another Beatles Signed Magazine Photo

Another signed magazine photo coming to the same auction as the Royal Variety picture book. Contrast in these signatures are Pretty good similar to the other photo. Do the autographs look “too careful” to anyone else? Any thoughts?

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

C1BF7D34-4BE2-4034-B6D2-E8B13FA62AD7.jpeg, 218 KB
F25DF46B-9628-458B-9165-B7737E61905B.jpeg, 254 KB
4819FAA9-A79E-4EAC-8826-1790066B9EE8.jpeg, 180 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on November 25, 2018 at 11:23pm

I see your point with George and Ringo's as they do indeed look unrushed - but Paul and John's look typical (rushed).

Another thing: it's funny to me that Paul, even though the band was established worldwide superstars, still felt like it necessary to add "Beatles" to his signature - as they all frequently did back in the Cavern days.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ryan on November 29, 2018 at 10:35am

Nope. Don't like these either. No life to them. If by looking at them you can't pinpoint a time frame when they were signed, then they're generic and fake.