Feb. 4: We're expanding and reorganizing our discussion forums. Excuse our dust.

Michael Jackson

....

Views: 193

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on April 21, 2019 at 1:28am

I don’t think this is authentic.

Permalink Reply by Angus Williams on April 21, 2019 at 1:32am

Based on what specifically?

Permalink Reply by James on April 21, 2019 at 1:38am

Well, the J looks strange to me for one thing.  And the formation of the middle part of Michael doesn’t look right to me.  And it’s the overall slant and flow of the autograph that looks off.  But see what others think.

RSS

Sign up for our Newsletter!

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2026   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service