James's Discussions (3,262)

Discussions Replied To (3017) Replies Latest Activity

"My preliminary hunch is that it’s an autopen sig."

James replied yesterday to Yes or No on this RFK?

1 yesterday
Reply by James

"Point taken.  But nobody can beat PSA QO when it comes to ineptitude...imo...and exp…"

James replied on Monday to Quick Opinion vs COA

41 yesterday
Reply by Eric K. Longo

"Yes, I view the grading of signatures as mostly a gimmick that some people unfortuna…"

James replied on Monday to WHEN AUTHENTICATORS AUTHENTICATE (AUTOGRAPHS) TOO STRICTLY- IS IT GOOD OR BAD FOR THE HOBBY??

21 13 hours ago
Reply by Steve Zarelli

"Unfortunately, these are bad."

James replied on Monday to Madonna real signature or not?

5 on Monday
Reply by James

"OTOH, I would put quite a bit of faith in an Epperson quick opinion.  Epperson helpe…"

James replied on Monday to Quick Opinion vs COA

41 yesterday
Reply by Eric K. Longo

"Again, it’s not a good option when they make a TON of mistakes.  Why?  Because since…"

James replied on Monday to Quick Opinion vs COA

41 yesterday
Reply by Eric K. Longo

"And it’s unfortunately also not a good option when QO renders a “Likely Not Genuine”…"

James replied on Monday to Quick Opinion vs COA

41 yesterday
Reply by Eric K. Longo

"PSA’s QO is certainly not useful in 80% of cases, probably more like 20%.  And I kno…"

James replied on Monday to Quick Opinion vs COA

41 yesterday
Reply by Eric K. Longo

"I have commented before, imo, PSA/DNA’s QO is almost worthless.  That’s not a commen…"

James replied on Sunday to Quick Opinion vs COA

41 yesterday
Reply by Eric K. Longo

"That is a really cool story, Juha!  Sometimes life has a fascinating way of making t…"

James replied on Saturday to Sometimes life gives you a second chance

1 on Saturday
Reply by James

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2009-2017   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Community Manager.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service