Hi Guys, thanks again for your expertise. I have a chance to buy a cut autograph. It comes with the letter sent in 1976 and this was supposedly the return card. He mounted it with the photo. I only own a couple cuts (I prefer photos). What are your thoughts and does $250 sound fair?
Tags:
I would skip that just on contrast.Even if authentic (I did not look), the memory of a good price fades, but poor contrast will never improve.
Do you mean the fading on the autograph? I kind of noticed that too. The color of the paper doesnt help. Thanks for the input.
Light ink application or fading, it is not a good look. If genuine, which I doubt, it is easily overpowered by a good b/w photo and on its own it wouldn't look much. I just don't see any eye appeal.
Blast contrast on a vintage album pages is not the norm, but one does the best they can with those inks and papers. This is from RR:
MIght well be. Very hard to see with that scan. And buying framed things is never a good idea unless you can examine the item in hand. Frames=surprises.
Is this the same?
Holy crap, it is exactly the same! I overlayed them in photoshop. Where did that one come from if you don't mind me asking. The guy even has a letter that he sent to John Wayne and said he got this back. I asked why John Wayne sent back a cut. He said he couldn't remember. Wow. just wow.
Thank you very much.
Thank you so much. It appears to be exactly the one Mike shared. exactly. You guys are the BEST! I am learning from you!
That is another example? It is the same exact signature so how is the paper and matting different? This indicates a print (prints). And explains the framing.
You NAILED it!
My pleasure. Mike did it. I just used my eyes. I don't think $250 sounds so good now ;)
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service