We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Rolling Stones & Led Zeppelin: Need Your Help

As the years go by and I learn more about the hobby, I like to go back through pieces I bought years earlier and make sure I was making the right decisions back then. I bought the following two records from a UACC Registered Dealer. I'd appreciate any opinions and insight on these two pieces. Thanks in advance!

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 9, 2012 at 3:03pm

The plant is good. The jagger and Richard look good also. I don't know page at all.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JXE on August 10, 2012 at 8:51am

The Plant worries me because it's a little too "neat". However, I know he's been all over the place with his signature through the years. Would anyone else care to comment on these signatures?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 10, 2012 at 10:03am

this is a 100% authentic plant signature from a little over a year ago.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on August 10, 2012 at 9:10am

That's funny when you say an autograph like Plant's is too neat! Heck theres hardly anything to look at! LOL

The Page and Plant look fine to me, The Stones I would have to see the whole item as one to make the call. They look a bit like ones that came from a dealer from NJ that moved to Florida a while back.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JXE on August 10, 2012 at 9:24am

Hi Roger,

Thank you SO MUCH for taking a look at these! I have taken more pictures; I hope they help. I did get them from a dealer in Florida about 2-3 years ago. I believe they were once in New Jersey. Is that a problem? The sleuth in me finds it odd that the Stones record has been touched up with a marker in some small areas in the corners and sides to make it appear to be in better condition than it is. But then again, who knows what some people are thinking when it comes to condition. Anyways, I hope this additional info helps: