Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by JAKE JONES on December 8, 2012 at 5:24pm

Don`t look good to me, i`am not a expert so wait for a few more opinions.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ben M on December 8, 2012 at 9:36pm

The P is not right and the whole last name is not good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 9, 2012 at 1:41pm

These appear to be signed by the same person, and I don't believe it is McCartney.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 9, 2012 at 7:53pm

I wouldn't completely write these off. They're tough because they appear very rushed, but I think that they could possibly be authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by GCL on December 10, 2012 at 7:28am

A-ha! The only autograph I have some degree of limited confidence in. :-D The one on Revolver looks good (pics 1 and 3) - there is a peculiar quality and angle of the "u" and big, awkward loop in the "l" in "Paul" that I look for - also the the line from "P" to "a". Even the second one on Pepper looks OK to me.

If I remember right, Mr Epperson has a page on his website devoted solely to McCartney signatures as they evolved over time. Perhaps you can send it to him for online authentication.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 10, 2012 at 2:51pm

the strange angles of the letters in both names on both covers are extremely untypical.  if I just saw the Revolver cover alone, I might say its possible, but seeing the other one, which is way off, but still exhibits the angular letter formation makes me feel that both of these are bad.

• ▶ Reply