Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on January 24, 2013 at 10:08am

Although its very hard to tell with certainty due to the photo, it doesnt look genuine to me right off. But i just cant see well enough to be 100 percent sure.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Aaron Ryan on January 24, 2013 at 10:15am

Thanks Carl. Yeah its a pretty bad photo :/ I meant to upload this one aswell to see if it was anygood. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Trond Johansen on January 24, 2013 at 12:47pm

The first one is almost impossible to tell due to quality, the second I will guess..negative.. It seems like a strange combination of the way he signed in the 90`s and today. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Aaron Ryan on January 24, 2013 at 4:24pm

I contacted the seller of the Bruce magazine and he said it "comes from a source that’s connected in the music business and they are real promos signatures" He also has these AC/DC and Aerosmith autographs for sale if there any help in determining if the Springsteen is real or not?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on January 24, 2013 at 8:02pm

I don't think either of these are real. If you click on the AC/DC picture above, you will see an Iron Maiden picture with horrible fake autographs on it. And it's the same with both AC/DC and Aerosmith. The autographs are way off.

If the Bruce Springsteen autograph was real, it would not be a promotional signature. Because those are usually much nicer than the average autograph from the artist. In this case, the Bruce autograp is horrible. Even for a rushed one.

If you like, I can point out all the misstakes that have been made on the Iron Maiden photo.

With this said, I would stay far, far away from this seller.

• ▶ Reply