We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Paul McCartney & George Harrison - Real or fake?

I would really appreciate if someone could help me with these Paul McCartney and George Harrison autographs. McCartney should be signed in the 60s and Harrison in the 80s.

Originally they come from the same long time collector, but are now being offered from a seller that I know previously have sold genuine ones...

Do you think these are good or bad?

Thanks for helping!

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 6, 2013 at 11:54am

The Paul is authentic, in my opinion. I believe that the George is also authentic, but very rushed.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 6, 2013 at 1:50pm

I agree with Ballroom

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on November 6, 2013 at 3:40pm

my opinion is the paul is no good. that is not his hand writing. the george might be real, but can't say for sure.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 6, 2013 at 4:52pm

Good point. The Paul writing does indeed look off. I suspect that both of these may be good forgeries.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 6, 2013 at 6:09pm

not convinced

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 6, 2013 at 6:56pm

The transition from the "T" to the "N" is wrong. It's missing the upstroke and downstroke.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on November 6, 2013 at 7:00pm

someone convince me with an example of paul's signing with an 's', and 't', in the word 'best', or an 'o' in 'from' that will change my opinion that this is not a fake paul. also, the ' very', is not even close to being right. if this is suppose to be from the 60's, i have never see an example of paul ever signing, 'all the VERY best', during that time period.