Beatles / Paul McCartney - good or bad?

Please let me know what you think about this Paul McCartney, claimed to been signed in the late 60s. The seller have previously sold genuine ones, but that's no guarantee...

Thanks for helping!

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Cogo on March 27, 2014 at 2:55pm

Any Beatles fans out there who could help me? Thanks!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on March 27, 2014 at 3:15pm

I am right in the middle on this one. There some things I don't like about it, but some things that look positive.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on March 27, 2014 at 4:43pm

I also have doubts about this one, which to me doesn't appear consistent with his late-60's signature style.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on March 27, 2014 at 4:59pm

It's a no from me

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on March 27, 2014 at 8:30pm

i am going to say no on this one. the paul looks wrong, and the m, into c. but alot of it looks pretty ok. if it is real, i would guess 1966, and no later. if it is fake, it is a pretty good try.