Eric Keith Longo's Discussions (21,520)

Discussions Replied To (20518) Replies Latest Activity

"That stamp on the reverse (DB071989-02) is a classic archival or press inventory cod…"

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 5 to Bowie real?

17 Feb 10
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

"Yes. they are mixed. Ford/peters is a forger. I would avoid anything from him that d…"

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 5 to Bowie real?

17 Feb 10
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

"Here is my Thom IP August 16th, 1996: "

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to Radiohead - do these graphs look genuine?

4 Feb 4
Reply by KellyEff

"+1"

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to Dick Tracy SP

3 Feb 4
Reply by AustinCollector

"The crossed out text under/nearby is interesting."

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to YES - Did Bill Bruford Really Sign This Way?

2 Feb 5
Reply by Findbooks

"Yes, very nice indeed. "

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to Floyd 1967 Signatures

2 Feb 4
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

"A very poor Gleason forgery: "

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to The (OLDER) Jackie Gleason Autograph Thread! Genuine examples from every period! Cavalcade of Secretarials!

585 yesterday
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

"The OP 1976 is too atypical for me."

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to Bowie real?

17 Feb 10
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

"This was my 1976: "

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 4 to Bowie real?

17 Feb 10
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

"Bowie can be a minefield these days. The first appears OK. Not sure what is going on…"

Eric Keith Longo replied Feb 3 to Bowie real?

17 Feb 10
Reply by Eric Keith Longo

RSS

Sign up for our Newsletter!

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2026   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service