We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
ball is bogus in my opinion. not sure about photo.
I don't like the photo. I think the ball may be good. Its an earlier sig. Now I`m no expert on Ripken by no means. Only my opinion.
i think the ball is an earlier sig.
I still think its junk. looks slowly written to me. and I have never seen another one like this. he has been pretty consistent over the years.
Both look bad to me. I wouldn't buy either of them.
I dont like either.
You would probably have to find some known 1993 examplars to use to authenticate it 100% .
He has changed his signature at least four times in his career. The stuff you have looks like his earlier signatures.
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service