We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

I believe both to be Genuine, they have the (it) factor in his C and al. J on the BB seems suspect but still genuine. Opinions please    

Views: 1382

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

ball is bogus in my opinion.  not sure about photo.

My book

I don't like the photo.  I think the ball may be good.  Its an earlier sig.  Now I`m no expert on Ripken by no means.  Only my opinion. 

i think the ball is an earlier sig.

I still think its junk.  looks slowly written to me.  and I have never seen another one like this. he has been pretty consistent over the years.

Both look bad to me. I wouldn't buy either of them.

Agree, I would pass.

I dont like either.

The photo doesn't look good , but the baseball has some chance. Here is a similar authentic one . don't know.

You would probably have to find some known 1993 examplars to use to authenticate it 100% .

He has changed his signature at least four times in his career. The stuff you have looks like his earlier signatures.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service