We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

What do you guys think about this GNR signed LP?

Views: 1699

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

After doing a tad more research something is wrong with that Matt Sorum. Go compare it to others maybe you guys can see it better. 

I dont like how The "s" looks like slash's and the "a" looks like axls slant. Way too  many consistencies between the group. 

Its interesting, i read something, i believe on here not too long ago, that some forgers were getting the harder names on a group signed piece legitimately, and then forging the other signatures to throw off people. Although that may not be what is happening here at all. I too own a piece that quite a few thought was not genuine, a jimmy page, but when i ran it by roger and a couple other guys who know zepp really well, they all thought it was real just a rushed sig. So if Roger gave the thumbs up, on all odds its probably real, as hes the best their is. In my opinion though the Axl looks okay from what i can tell, the duff looks typical, the izzy i cant really see all that well, and slash and matt look off to me. They look close, but just off in my opinion. So it could be that they were rushed possibly. One thing for sure though, you had to get Axl first, or at least def before slash.

Roger did tell me that it was authentic in his opinion.  When it comes to music autographs in my mind he is the authority.  I appreciate what he does for the hobby/collectors.

So do you think the Axl is no good too?  I thought the Axl looked fine which is the main reason I purchased it.  I was not sure on Slash but I thought it looked close but very small second S.  I figured it was worth the price just for the Axl. 

I thin k this is REAL..I got them in person and Duff , matt , AXl, ands SlASH LOOK  good..wh osi the one on the lefr upper> ? Dizzy? izzy? lol ...I thin kits good.....so...take your chances....you have other items person is selling I can look at.. who is the dealer?

On second look--the AXL is a bit too BIG.. and spacious...whe nI saw him graph in person the letters were smaller and closer together--touching but al lreadable...this looks too big ands spread out..but it is dated o6 and I didnt get AXL after 1998 so..in 8 years ???

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service