Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mark Miller on July 5, 2020 at 6:18am

No good 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 5, 2020 at 9:14am

I think it could be authentic.   never studied his signature closely but looks similar to many that have been authenticated.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Miller on July 5, 2020 at 9:28am

Seemed to me the “T” “H” and “L” of his first name are normally narrowly looped. That’s what I thought seemed off

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 5, 2020 at 11:05am

I think it depends on when he signed and the surface.  If you look at other signed balls, they are similar to this one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason Spray on July 5, 2020 at 11:55am

My thoughts go both ways like you guys, but why forge the other names? I’ve never heard of those guys. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 5, 2020 at 1:54pm

I really believe it is good.   Compare it to this one.  I believe it compares favorably;

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Miller on July 5, 2020 at 3:06pm

I won’t disagree. Things such as this is where I do like a PSA cert when it’s “close” however you are far more knowledgeable in sports autographs than I, so I will defer.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 5, 2020 at 4:21pm

LOL, I really don't study Paige, but I am just comparing to ones on the PSA site, which is where this photo came from.  

• ▶ Reply